Taylormade SIM2 Titanium 3W vs Callaway Epic Max 3W reviews測試比較!～下集

Taylormade SIM2 Titanium 3W vs Callaway Epic Max 3W reviews測試比較!～上集
http://www.peargolf.com/article/taylormade-sim2-titanium-3w-vs-callaway-...

下集開始。

通常第一回數據會稍微弱一點，因為身體還沒有熱開，動作和速度力量還沒有燃燒起來。第二回合就是比較好找正常的結果。距離和穩定性就比較好。第一回合的資料比較是可能下場前9洞的表現，我的左右偏差率都在可以接受的範圍。不會太大，但我的球道木都在第二個或球道上使用，所以方向偏一點或打fade就會在果嶺兩邊。

打SIM2 Titanium都是打小fade，應該是桿身的問題。三菱的Tensei 65 S，桿身前/中端比較軟，感覺頭會甩一下。所以側旋會比Epic Max多。因為是全新的桿子，桿身還撐的住，所以小fade是不錯的球路。但可以換桿身來解決這個問題。打SIM2 鈦合金的擊球角度在13～17度，這是合理的範圍，所以得到的飛行距離在200碼和滾動20碼的結果。這是我用鈦合金桿頭的射程範圍，也就符合我的預期。

出球速度在120～130mph。smash factor這是Trackman的擊球效能，在foresign裡是efficiency，我是1.46，1.5是完美，所以越接近這個數據就是你擊球撞擊效果是越好。如果在1.5-1個範圍都是很棒的動作結果。動作穩定和擊球紮實度與否也和這個數據有關。倒旋在3000+-200轉，我個人覺得有點高。有調整空間，當然不要滾太多的話就這個數據也是可以。要用這桿子是要衝距離還是落果嶺？

彈道算中間，因為我打Epic Max是比這隻要高。算比較進階型的桿頭設定，因為桿頭的起發角不高，用的人要有速度和穩定的擊球動作，這樣效果才能出來。所以測試球桿最好要2支桿子去比較，才能有一個完整的圖形。Sim2 鈦合金算中彈道。如果是中彈道我會設定衝距離，尤其第一桿打壞，或5桿洞第二桿需要距離，這樣的桿子可以連滾帶爬有個230～240碼。就可以有機會拼2桿上。

Epic Max是攻果嶺的設定，擊球起發角度比較高，彈道也高，所以落點可以滾少一點。這就是依據桿頭和桿身的特性，去設定桿子的風格和擊球策略。所以訂製球桿是很複雜，也需要考慮不少東西，不是你打哪一支順手就是最好。需要看你的需求、問題、和擊球策略去思考全面性的東西，才能有一個好的結果和球桿設定。而且也要根據球友本身的能力和技術去思考，這也是我和一般訂製師不同，很多美國人喜歡我的全面性思考和球桿設定。會指名要找我。

落地角度在40度+- 5度範圍，是一個不錯的角度，可以得到不錯的滾動效果。打到甜蜜點距離會超過220碼，沒打到甜蜜點在200～210碼，算不錯的結果。但這是理想狀態，下場可能就要減個10碼才是可能的結果。所以這樣來看，SIM2 鈦合金是真的不錯。也是我下一個要入手的桿子了。

Generally the first round of the data is not as good as I used to since your body is not in playing condition and the swing speed and power haven't driven up. The second round becomes normal and better. The distance and consistency are back to my normal performances. The direction accuracy is about 5 degree to -5 degree range, the ball is landed on the small circle.

Since my 3W is always played on the second shot after the tee shot and the misshot is on the green's edge or the bunker that is acceptable. Sim2 Titanium is always fade that should be the shaft profile. I feel the shaft is tip and mid section soft design and when I release the 3W, the head is acting more bouncing which is the reason why it creates more side spin.

If I would like to make it to flight straight, there are many ways to work it out such as replace the new shaft to make the tip firm or stands open to make my striking to draw. The launch angle is 13~17 degree that is good for me to get the right trajectory and 40+- 5 degree landing angle. The trajectory is mid height with penetrating ball flighting.

I can get about 200 yards carry distance and 20 yards rolling result. Comparing the Epic Max 3W, the trajectory of Epic Max is higher than SIM2 titanium and carrying distance is about 10 yards shorter. I would say Epic Max is the golf club to target the green with high trajectory and less rolling ability. The SIM 2 titanium is able to get more distance in both carry and rolling distances.

It's good to play SIM2 Titanium on the par 5 second shot or long par 4 second shot that needs to drive the distance over 240 yards for 2nd shot on the green mission. Epic Max 3W launch angle is higher than SIM2 titanium, that's the head's center of gravity differentiation for two 3W. I have bought one Callaway Epic Max 3W and now I have better idea to setup this 3W for my play.

Through the testing, I am able to know the profiles of two 3W that are very important for me to build the knowledge base on the product then further to build the right specification and setup for my Epic Max 3W. Epic Max is low CG and high launch profile that is easier for golfers to lift the ball on the air, on the other hand, SIM2 titanium is low launch with mid/low spin rate for penetrating ball flighting.

請尊重本站內容智慧財產權.勿未經洋梨高爾夫同意下進行非法轉載文章!如想進行文章轉載需求,請與下面電郵聯系!

本站新設新浪微博网?版：http://weibo.com/peargolf

手机版：http://weibo.cn/peargolf

大家可加入我的粉絲團,我會不定時將新的信息與活動發怖在微博與臉書，推特內.

Facebook/臉書上搜尋@peargolfcom就有洋梨高爾夫的粉絲頁。twitter/推特搜尋“@GolfPear”