Ping G410 Plus 10.5/Matrix 5M3 S硬度木桿測試～實際測試篇2！

更多此產品照片都在以下聯結!
https://photos.app.goo.gl/Uywa1PctedJjGypj7
https://www.facebook.com/pg/peargolfcom/photos

中國讀者可到我的新浪微博中參考此桿照片.
http://weibo.com/peargolf

Ping G410 Plus 10.5/Matrix 5M3 S硬度木桿測試～產品說明篇！
http://www.peargolf.com/article/ping-g410-plus-105matrix-5m3-syingdumuga...

Ping G410 Plus 10.5/Matrix 5M3 S硬度木桿測試～規格說說明篇！
http://www.peargolf.com/article/ping-g410-plus-105matrix-5m3-syingdumuga...

Ping G410 Plus 10.5/Matrix 5M3 S硬度木桿測試～實際測試篇！
http://www.peargolf.com/article/ping-g410-plus-105matrix-5m3-syingdumuga...

實際測試篇2開始。

2. 桿身回饋 - 上面有提到，這桿子在前兩次打起來真的不是太好。硬邦邦的感覺，一點韌性都沒有，力量也灌不太下去。桿身的回饋也是一潭死水。完全感覺不到桿身的彈力或變化。不過M系列的桿身就是如此，性能導向，材質強度比較高。就是給有速度力量的使用者去發揮。不過前兩次的手感雖然不好，也說明桿身的強度高，需要打一定次數才能把桿身的內部結構彈力給發揮出來。也可以理解為什麼會有這樣的回饋。

從第三次後，桿身就像活起來一樣，可以感覺桿身的中間區塊有韌性出來。折點在桿身中間位置。下桿時是感覺不太出來桿身的物理變化，但擊球瞬間可以感覺桿頭甩出去，桿身開始彈送的效果。到力量釋放時，桿身的中間部位因為力量釋放會有震動的感覺出現！所以第三次打這桿子真的完全不一樣，而且非常有樂趣。

這也是為什麼我測試桿子需要花上幾個月時間來完成。因為有時候你無法感覺到和得到桿子最好的結果狀態。這不是桿子的問題，有時候是我們自己的狀況不好也會影響桿子的表現。所以測試球桿對我來說，要避免錯誤的結果或不公平的狀況，就是要在不同的時間，不同的地點，反覆去使用觀察才能得到一個比較完整的結果。我也給朋友來試，也是這樣的狀況。因為如果拿M6組合和G410給人試，多數人會選M6。

因為桿身桿頭的組合最容易發揮，同時手感好。但G410/5M3是比較有個性的桿子。喜歡的人會愛這種調調的風格。這桿身的回饋不會太多，下桿時桿身變化不大，甚至沒有，但在擊球前後就會變化比較多，樂趣也在這。所以它是屬於速度派的瞬間桿身變化風格。喜歡桿子簡單、變化少的這桿身就是你的菜！

3. 彈道和距離 - 5M3 的彈道就是中低彈道。雖然是50g等級，但彈道設計就是平平的在空中飛行的方式。球質是比較侵略性的風格。這點在我以前的測試裡就展現的球風。在G410也是如此。當桿身內部結構打開前後，對於打出來的彈道高度和球速其實都沒有太大差別。球速很快，不輸M6的組合。彈道也是平平的飛行。就是那種打起來很讓人熱血沸騰的桿子。

飛行的距離如果打到桿面甜蜜點的效果是和M6差不多。但非甜蜜點的距離，M6就比較優。會差10幾碼的距離。所以論距離它絕對不會輸給其他品牌的桿子，但重點在非甜蜜點的距離影響。我覺得這點會是和M6這類桿子的差異。因為M6它是整個桿面就是高反彈的設計，所以打在非甜蜜點的位置，效果自然會比其他桿子要好。

如果選手打其實兩隻桿子的距離差不多，但一般人打就可以看出差別。因為我們擊球的精準度沒有選手的高和力量大。這也是我用M6下場距離都可以維持在250Y左右，好的時候會出現260Y的機會。但G410的平均距離就是240Y，好的時候是250Y。不能說不好，我其他的桿子也是這樣的表現。算是達標，只是對手更突出。

但我想還是有機會改善這塊的表現，換不同桿身可以改變操控球桿的能力和效果。G410還有更好的表現空間。只是和5M3的組合對我來說不是最佳的配置。

本文未完，完結篇請點下方。

Ping G410 Plus 10.5/Matrix 5M3 S硬度木桿測試～完結篇!
http://www.peargolf.com/article/ping-g410-plus-105matrix-5m3-syingdumuga...

2. Shaft feedback - The first couple time of playing, this driver is not really good to play and feel is hard and uncomfortable. But it doesn't effect its performance and ball speed. It's due to the shaft profile and material strongness. During the downswing, the power is not easy to load to the club, and unloading is not smooth. But it all changes on the third time for playing it. The shaft becomes differently and I can feel the shaft mid section is the kick point. There is a vibration after releasing the power.

The downswing is easier to load the power and at the striking pointing the head is smooth kicking the ball with big smash. When the head is striking the ball then I can feel the shaft's tip is vibrating. There is no feedback during the up and down swing, only before and after the impact has the feel. That's typical Matrix M series shaft profile that needs the power to drive the shaft bending and releasing. It requires the power to drive the shaft and result on the ball speed to the air.

The new club needs to play certain times for making the shaft become activation. Although the performance has no difference, the feel will entirely different. Compared with TM M6 driver, Veylix Mansion shaft is easier to handle and respond to the feel is comfortable and smooth. I would say it's different shaft profile and 5M3 is for hitter, not swinger like me. The 5M3 is typical performance driven shaft for good swing speed golfers.

3. Distance and trajectory - Here is the 5M3's advantage. As the performance driven shaft, the ball speed must be fast and the trajectory is mid or low. This shaft is all fit on these characteristic. When you play this driver, it will head up your passion and play one on one without hesitation. You can really enjoy striking the ball and it's like bullet travel on the air with solid penetration. I like its performance for sure.

Hitting on the sweet spot can get the distance like my TM M6, but with off sweet spot hits, the distance is shorter than M6. It's about 15 yards shorter. Since M6 face is high COR with thinner for high bouncing character, and off sweet spot can get the distance differentiation on face design. For G410, the best distance for me is about 250Y and off sweet spot is about 230Y. It's like my other driver's performance and reach the distance requirement.

I think it's the shaft issue that doesn't fit my swing profile. I will build another shaft to fit G410 plus later to find out the best shaft for me on G410. I do believe there is still the room for G410 to perform like TM M6. The difficulty is G410 head required more specific shaft profile to fit. I think Japanese shaft should work better than Matrix/LAGP.

to be continued..

請尊重本站內容智慧財產權.勿未經洋梨高爾夫同意下進行非法轉載文章!如想進行文章轉載需求,請與下面電郵聯系!

本站新設新浪微博网?版：http://weibo.com/peargolf

手机版：http://weibo.cn/peargolf

大家可加入我的粉絲團,我會不定時將新的信息與活動發怖在微博與臉書，推特內.

Facebook/臉書上搜尋@peargolfcom就有洋梨高爾夫的粉絲頁。twitter/推特搜尋“@GolfPear”